Bombers attack first

I think bombers should attack cities first, before tanks or other units, its strategically better and it makes more sense for it to be that way.. Also, its very annoying when you attack with tanks and bombers but there are only bombers outside the city.:wall:

Highest attack attacks first <3

No support. This is how the game works, deal with it.

Only with SM bombers attacks first before tanks does

Well they should attack first >:(

Just send 1 inf.

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 15:54

Just send 1 inf.

This.
No Support.

Napísal TheRiddler, 11.11.2013 at 16:00

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 15:54

Just send 1 inf.

This.
No Support.

bombers attack before inf <3

Napísal TheRiddler, 11.11.2013 at 16:00

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 15:54

Just send 1 inf.

This.
No Support.

bombers attack before inf <3

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 17:26

Napísal TheRiddler, 11.11.2013 at 16:00

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 15:54

Just send 1 inf.

This.
No Support.

bombers attack before inf <3

I know right. Aizen wants the bombers to die first. He doesn't like sending tanks with bombers, and failing because of tanks dying first.

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 17:32

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 17:26

Napísal TheRiddler, 11.11.2013 at 16:00

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 15:54

Just send 1 inf.

This.
No Support.

bombers attack before inf <3

I know right. Aizen wants the bombers to die first. He doesn't like sending tanks with bombers, and failing because of tanks dying first.

Rank 6 and still using RA.

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 18:08

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 17:32

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 17:26

Napísal TheRiddler, 11.11.2013 at 16:00

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 15:54

Just send 1 inf.

This.
No Support.

bombers attack before inf <3

I know right. Aizen wants the bombers to die first. He doesn't like sending tanks with bombers, and failing because of tanks dying first.

Rank 6 and still using RA.

At least he doesn't us PD and spam tanks :-P

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 18:08

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 17:32

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 17:26

Napísal TheRiddler, 11.11.2013 at 16:00

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 15:54

Just send 1 inf.

This.
No Support.

bombers attack before inf <3

I know right. Aizen wants the bombers to die first. He doesn't like sending tanks with bombers, and failing because of tanks dying first.

Rank 6 and still using RA.

I mean really? Not even SM? That is a better strat for noobs than RA even...

Napísal Yazzy, 31.12.1969 at 18:00

I think bombers should attack cities first, before tanks or other units, its strategically better and it makes more sense for it to be that way.. Also, its very annoying when you attack with tanks and bombers but there are only bombers outside the city.:wall:

support

the reason why your tanks always attack(not when you use sm or nc) first is because of the attacking unit priority which is decided by who has the highest attack point per unit in the stack the defence priority work the same way

Stupid idea.

Tanks and infantry take cities/countries, not bombers. So if your infantry and tanks attack first, they will die first so you're left with bombers that cannot take the city/country.

No support.

No support.

If you're a tank strategy using such a large amount of bombers that you don't need to send as many tanks then something is wrong with you.

You argue logic/common sense? Here's logic/common sense:

Send and infantry or a militia. They are cheaper then tanks and will attack after either tanks or bombers. There is absolutely no reason why the game mechanics need to change to where bombers always attack first.

Tanks are intended to be the bomber of RA. In blitz, using tanks is... idk. If you're using blitz you shouldn't complain sense your infantry should have about as much range if not more.

If bombers can't take cities then I don't want to waste units that can, I only send bombers to clear out a city, like how they are used inrl . I don't want to wait one turn to capture the city after its cleared since I've probably wasted another turn to break the walls, its generally better for bombers to go first, it could be an upgrade or something

No Support,

Bombers already attack before tanks if you use sky menace.

Napísal Dr Lecter, 11.11.2013 at 23:58

No support.

If you're a tank strategy using such a large amount of bombers that you don't need to send as many tanks then something is wrong with you.

You argue logic/common sense? Here's logic/common sense:

Send and infantry or a militia. They are cheaper then tanks and will attack after either tanks or bombers. There is absolutely no reason why the game mechanics need to change to where bombers always attack first.

Tanks are intended to be the bomber of RA. In blitz, using tanks is... idk. If you're using blitz you shouldn't complain sense your infantry should have about as much range if not more.

I have no problems with blitz. It is his play that needs work.

Napísal Fockmeeard, 11.11.2013 at 22:06

Stupid idea.

Tanks and infantry take cities/countries, not bombers. So if your infantry and tanks attack first, they will die first so you're left with bombers that cannot take the city/country.

Actually, Tanks die first. So this topic is about to make bombers die first.
But infantries attack last, so you can just send your tanks + bombers stack and 1 inf.
The game chooses the unit with highest attack to attack first, so the only way to do this would be changing bomber's attack (they won't xD) or adjust the code.

No support, just send 1 inf .

Napísal Xenosapien, 11.11.2013 at 18:52

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 18:08

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 17:32

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 17:26

Napísal TheRiddler, 11.11.2013 at 16:00

Napísal Guest, 11.11.2013 at 15:54

Just send 1 inf.

This.
No Support.

bombers attack before inf <3

I know right. Aizen wants the bombers to die first. He doesn't like sending tanks with bombers, and failing because of tanks dying first.

Rank 6 and still using RA.

I mean really? Not even SM? That is a better strat for noobs than RA even...

Ikr

Right we know why this will not be implemented. Locked.