Ending the war of RP and Competitiveness

Hi! Throughout RP's existence, it has been loved, but also despised. This has only escalated ever more throughout the time period it has been with the community. Recently, I posted in the thread "Soon it will die out", and came up with an idea I think might make a compromise between the two very different styles of game play not just for our community but every game, and I would like to see the community's reaction.

What if we could get some well-published map makers to make maps specifically designed to focus on a struggle of one particular area in competitive play; economy and army size/composition. As we know, RP combines insane economies and OP units that make the game incredibly easy to manage. However, making a role-play map with very poor countries who must make the right decisions to rise their economy and wage war effectively, or making a role-play map with slightly OP economies but unit compositions and city values that make sizes and attack/defense/HP/etc values very difficult to fight with, thus making strategic warfare a key element to victory. These are the two very basic things a player MUST learn to function competitively in AtWar; RPers are deemed unskilled noobs who can't win without OP units and capital, but with this, they can still enjoy a laid-back, recreational game that also prepares them to fight in other scenarios.

Problems with this is that with a RP element still available, diplomacy is an issue. However, this is the case for EVERY game without a prewritten scenario to manage the diplomacy according to the desires of the map maker(s). So, this shouldn't be a set back in making these maps when it will atleast be a step forward in no longer dividing the community and integrating a far easier, and less insulted, transition from styles of game-play.

Thoughts on this?