Coalition reputation

I think you should make this option for several reasons.
A lot of "troll cw's" have been noticed lately, unfair behaviour, and even changing settings of game just before starting it.
I know there is option to give negative or positive reputation to individual player, but to be honest coalition is nothing more than group of individuals who fight/play under "same flag".


For example> last night i had this scenario.
I set up a deal in front of "Otpisani" to play against one coalition who is very higly ranked.
We make a deal for Otpisani to play with ranks 9-9-7 and opponents offered us diffrent variety of ranks and we choosed to play against same or similiar ranks, so it was> 10-8-7 that we choosed from their ranks, which they offered.
Someone opened the game in cw room and we all entered, even started the game.
Just when we started to pick the countries they suddenly left the game and started telling us how their rank 7 can't play becouse he is just rank 7 and that they will use higher rank instead of him (rank 10(.
Just to be clear this coalition started blaming us after we refused to play under that circumstances.

This kind of things dont make just individuals look bad, it makes their coalition look even worse.
I would like to hear what atwar community thinks about this suggestion.

Take my apologies for grammatical mistakes in text.

Edit- I forgot to write that only clan leaders should be able to give reputation to other clan.

This should be in coalition war section not in ideas and suggestion section.

Honestly, my opinion about all this rank stuff: It's all excuses.
Personally, I dont care if I play 10-10-10 or 8-8-8, because there are 10s who are really bad and there are 8s who are very strong. Don't know why clans even bother dealing about which ranks to use in a cw.

Its something else if they agree to a cw with only a rank 7 on to play and then pull back when they see opponent team. That's just bad behaviour. Either I trust my rank 7 to play or I don't - that shouldn't be based on the opponent.

Hm similar thing happened to us last week ...game started, they leave, remake game made ...suddenly their rank 8 has "gone offline" ...but they can use a rank 10 that just happened to came online a minute before they left the first game.

I just said ..."fuck off"

As long as idea is concerned ...i doubt this would show anything or help with anything ...just like players rep.

So your saying clans should have reps just like players and that clans then can rep farm???

The problem is the currently CW system.

In the past, a rank 7 used to be as strong as a rank 10. Why? because two factors:

1) General was free. This game was not a pay-for-win. The only difference between ranks was the upgrades.

Right now, general has become premium. This is a very big disadvantage.

2) The clan war system was a total mess. Let say, you have a clan full of ranks 5-8, and the only clans you can cw are ranks 10-12. Then you might want your rank 7 to be superman in orden to beat them. There was a lot more focused attention on low ranks, a lot of training coalitions. You want to away match the other clan as in the season only the first 10 CW'S count. But you also want to have the best players, doesnt matte which ranks.

Right now, you have 20 CW'S, and the last ones are the ones who count. This mean a lose is not important anymore. People want their high ranks for earn and keep updating more victorys. The unfair CW conditions has forced to what we call nowadays "Farming clans". And the low ranks either are in one of theses farming clans or just turned into non-competitive. Consecuences of the currently CW system:

- High ranks concentration in the Top clans. Since they play more CW's, they learn more that low ranks.

- A great reducing of "competitive" players. Since clans have already trained high ranks, the amount of training coalitions has be greatly reduced. Some clans have also dissapear.

- Great redution of competitive low ranks. Now is very unlikery to see an experimented rank 6 or 7.


As long as we have this currently system, there will away be rank disadvantage.

I like this idea, have a tiered reputation system

+100 rep - a perfect clan, with a reputation beyond repute.

+50 rep - Great group of fun and respectful players.

+25 rep - A Nice clan with a growing reputation in these parts.

0 rep - unknown quantity.

-25 rep - you have a trollvis1122 in your clan.

-50 rep - Trolls

-75 rep - Trolls and leavers, do not join or cw this clan

-100 rep - Your clan is Crimson Tide.

Napísal Permamuted, 04.09.2014 at 19:16

I like this idea, have a tiered reputation system

+100 rep - a perfect clan, with a reputation beyond repute.

+50 rep - Great group of fun and respectful players.

+25 rep - A Nice clan with a growing reputation in these parts.

0 rep - unknown quantity.

-25 rep - you have a trollvis1122 in your clan.

-50 rep - Trolls

-75 rep - Trolls and leavers, do not join or cw this clan

-100 rep - Your clan is Crimson Tide.

I laughed way harder than I should of at this. xD